The 2 most visited stone web sites in the world:

HOME
NEW Web Tools
Design Tools

Picture Submissions
Stone Consulting Pro
Search for Info:
Companies
Stones
Classified Ads
Stone Tips
Forum
Projects Gallery
Stone Calendar
News & Articles

Natural Stone Video
Natural Stone Video Library
Promote Your Company:
Register
Advertorial
Classified Ads
Banner Ads
Media Kit

Participate:
Stone Referral
Submit News
Submit a Recent Project
Additional Services:
Stone testing
Web development
Website Hosting

Architects:
Technical Data

Links
Contact Us
F.A.Q.
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy

Click here
Stone Failures-Why? Article #4
Article #1, Article #2, Article #3, Article #4, Article #5, Article #6, Article #7, Article #8, Article #9, Article #10, Article #11, Article #12, Article #13, Article #14

Value Engineering or Cost Cutting.

Cost cutting is taking and substituting materials or assembly methods in order to reduce costs.  Cost cutting contributes to failures when the long-term effect is not analyzed.  Let me use an example.  A hotel was built on the waterfront in San Diego. Granite was the specified material for countertops, floors and veneer.  The owner cut costs and changed the granite to a marble.  I had three meetings with three different head of maintenance personnel who tried to blame the marble for citric acid etching of the polish surface.

In each case, I began by stating the history of the changes that occurred and why.

The maintenance personnel became friendly to the high cost of maintenance associated with the cost cutting changes once they understood the history of the project.

Value engineering is a true process that accounts and documents the changes that do or do not affect the long-term performance of the changes created.

Value engineering may or may not work depending if the interrelationships with other components are compatible with reasons the original choices were dependent on.

An example:  A hospital was built in San Diego.  The general contractor value engineered and deleted the cement backer board to be used in the shower from the tile contractors contract.  The cement backer board was assigned to the drywall contractor.  The drywall contractor installed the cement backerboard.  The tile contractor was then asked to install the weather resistive barrier paper behind the cement backer board.  The tile contractor related the weather resistive barrier paper was no longer part of the contract with the tile contractor as the installation was eliminated when the backer board installation was deleted.  After discussion, the tile contractor was paid a cost to install a waterproof membrane over the backer board for direct bond of tile to the membrane in these showers.  This value-engineering example is one where value engineering was not fully performed as the coordination was omitted for the installation of weather resistive barrier papers or waterproof membranes with the change in assignment to contracts.

Be cautious when an exterior area is reduced in size to save money.  An example: Ribbons of tile and stone in concrete require drainage for moisture to exit from the ribbon; Expansion joints on both sides of the tile and stone abutting the concrete;

Expansion joints to divide up the length of the concrete; and where a waterproof membrane is used, the waterproof membrane must be presloped at least ¼ inch per foot.

Remember standing water or ponding water will contribute to failure of the installation.

Another example is a 6-story veneer project in San Diego.  The original tile contractor attended a meeting by the general contractor.  The general contractor related they were going to save the client a lot of money by changing to direct bond over concrete instead of installing over a wire reinforced mortar bed. The tile contractor refused to proceed with the contract and warned the exterior veneer would fail.  Another tile contractor was contracted with the general contractor for the installation of veneer with direct bond to concrete.  Six years later, as predicted, the veneer started falling off of the building structure.  The threat of litigation proceeded by the owner. The general contractor paid for the complete removal and replacement of the entire veneer assembly and installed the new veneer to the specifications that were originally assigned to the original contract.

The general contractor is now suing the installing tile contractor for the cost to install the veneer as originally designed and specified for this building.

Moral: “Never save your clients money on your own back!”

 

This article is part of a series of articles on Stone Failures (Dec. 2000) by Greg Mowat

Forensic Tile Consultants
9541 Vervain Street
San Diego, CA 92129-3523
(858) 484-8118, Fax 484-8302

The most visited stone site in the world.
© 1994-2002 natural-stone.com, All rights reserved.
Please read the terms of use for more information.
Optimized for 800x600